First time i got to know this word is in my English textbook of junior school as the form of professor shown in the word list. I bear firmly in my mind quickly originated from a memory of my father's story when he's travelled around the world. He often talked about his professor, a very knowledged and famous sicientist in British, who also came to my home once many years ago with a Parker pen as a present to me.
today, several yeas later, i notice this word again, coincidently, still from my textbook -- Mordern Auditing. And this time i was totally confused about what i was reading about when reviewing chapter 2, because what these almost 40 pages concerned seems not about the auditing itself, but in the light of philosephy, in detail for example, what is profession? ... Actually in my mind, or say, according to some so-called general rules, the first 1 or 2 chaper should have an overall introduction of what auditing is, like what educators do in my country. So here is another place i can feel something different after a year's living in this nation, and seems more deeply than any superficious point, that the westen people used to put the philosophy rationaly in the first position before any subject. Of course it's based on they enjoy the legally right of liberty of the beliefs and can argue with each other.
As a result, before they decribe a certain theory, the philosophy part would always be expressed first because it's the root of every hypothesis and directs the behaviour model of people when carrying out in practice. In contrary, we rarely invole such purely thinking in any introduction part in our country, most time we just being told what should do but why do like that. Definitely i'm now more favour the westen style of education, for sometimes the reason plays a more important role than concequence, and everybody should know it no matter what school people make a choice.
today, several yeas later, i notice this word again, coincidently, still from my textbook -- Mordern Auditing. And this time i was totally confused about what i was reading about when reviewing chapter 2, because what these almost 40 pages concerned seems not about the auditing itself, but in the light of philosephy, in detail for example, what is profession? ... Actually in my mind, or say, according to some so-called general rules, the first 1 or 2 chaper should have an overall introduction of what auditing is, like what educators do in my country. So here is another place i can feel something different after a year's living in this nation, and seems more deeply than any superficious point, that the westen people used to put the philosophy rationaly in the first position before any subject. Of course it's based on they enjoy the legally right of liberty of the beliefs and can argue with each other.
As a result, before they decribe a certain theory, the philosophy part would always be expressed first because it's the root of every hypothesis and directs the behaviour model of people when carrying out in practice. In contrary, we rarely invole such purely thinking in any introduction part in our country, most time we just being told what should do but why do like that. Definitely i'm now more favour the westen style of education, for sometimes the reason plays a more important role than concequence, and everybody should know it no matter what school people make a choice.
No comments:
Post a Comment